Over There with Felix Wetzel
| From Drop Box |
This guest post is from Felix Wetzel. It is both thought provoking, and possibly controversial. Please read what he has to say, consider it, and leave your thoughts in the comments. Special thanks to Bill Boorman for helping me get some great articles lined up for “Over There”, including this one.
Social Media is useless for talent acquisition
Let me make a prediction here: For most companies social media will never play a big part in their quest to attract talent. It’s too time-consuming, too fragmented and – in comparison to more traditional methods – it lacks goal orientation: lost revenue through unfilled positions is always more important than cost per hire.
Now granted, social media can bring down the cost per hire as there’s no recruitment fee attached to it, but here we are talking about delayed productivity and revenue generation.
Social media might work for big, sexy consumer brands such as Apple, Google, EA etc but didn’t they already attract lots of applications before social media, via their website? I suspect that HR people just love having a Facebook fanpage as they can update it independently of IT and don’t need to adhere to stringent security policies that forbids, for example, deep linking etc.
But for most companies (big and small) it isn’t working. At Jobsite, we track the behaviour and usage of job seekers and recruiters on a quarterly basis and our latest findings show that between August 08 and May 10 the usage of social media as a recruitment channel for business has halved from 18% to 9%. Instead of investing in their own social media campaign, companies are better off in focusing on their core business and core strength and instead give job boards (or as I prefer to call them recruitment retailers) the task to find and attract suitable candidates.
Back to basics
These findings are mirrored in the recruitment agency world: A large UK agency has discovered that most placements are being made by the consultants who spend most time on the phone and least placements are being made by the consultants who spend hours on social media listening and engaging. As Scott Stratten tweeted: “Listening and engagement isn’t a campaign.”
It’s good to see how recruitment agencies are transforming: One of the Top 5 agencies is going ‘old skool’, every consultant only deals with 150 candidates, but has to meet each one face to face and really understand their needs. Now that’s what candidates love! It also ensures the likelihood of candidate and recruiter being on the same wavelength and therefore working successfully together. Everybody’s a winner.
Cultural matching, or more precisely cultural mismatching, is the single biggest factor of candidates not settling in a job. At Jobsite, we ran research and it showed that £2.5billion per year is lost because of cultural mismatching.
Social media = a cultural checking tool
Now, that’s the natural fit for social media in the recruitment value chain: cultural matching (or for want of a better word “background checking”). And it isn’t a one way process: candidates have as much right and responsibility to check the company and social media gives incredibly simple access to employees. Not necessarily to interact but to find out what they say about their employer. By looking at what kind of people work for the company, what attitudes they display and what values they hold also reveals a lot about whether you would be happy there (as a side note: What a great way of assessing the “brand-fit” of current employees). So expect candidates to get pickier. Obviously this can also be reversed and recruiters can check the attitudes and cultural match of candidates before hiring. That’s the real power of social media and invaluable for the decision making process.
Implicit opt-ins
But this for me leads to an ethical dilemma. I believe that somebody’s private life is their private life and as long as it doesn’t affect their performance negatively, I don’t really care what they do in their free time (unless obviously it’s illegal and harmful to others). So ethically, I am opposed to all the dark arts of the sourcers, I am opposed to befriending an individual on Facebook for these reasons, I am bewildered by people wanting to share everything with everybody and I am absolutely delighted that Steve Boese’s students see Facebook as a private area that is shared only with friends. This shows maturity, caution and most importantly a holistic approach to life – there’s no difference between real world and virtual world, therefore hardwired behaviors are being mapped across to create a compartmentalized and healthy world. So where do you draw the line?
I think it’s fair game to look at everything that is publicly available via a simple Google search and if it brings up their Twitter handle, I’ll also look at that to get a better understanding of the person. But it’s ultimately up to the candidate what he wants to share. Opt-in is not only a prerequisite for email and sms, but also implicit for social media. At Jobsite we give candidates the option to include their Twitter handle and Linkedin profile. They are all self-determined adults, so let’s leave rights and responsibility where it belongs, with the individual.
Put the individual at the heart of your organization
We are all in a massive learning curve about social media and mobile, but one thing is already clear: The individual, and in our case the job seeker, will become more and more empowered. We -as an industry – repeat it over and over again. Now let’s behave and act accordingly: Instead of putting social media or mobile at the heart of the organization, let’s put the job seeker at the heart of it – that will completely change concepts such as talent pools and talent exchange, it requires us to rethink ATS integrations and how social media channels really aid the recruitment process, but most importantly it will reinforce respect for the individual and his private sphere and therefore create trust and candidate driven connectivity.
Let’s just remember: Nobody owns the individual but the individual. It’s not about owning the individual; it’s about knowing the individual for the individual’s benefit, for the creation of a life simplifying and life enhancing service.
Biography
Felix Wetzel is the Group Marketing Director for Jobsite and author of the ‘People, Brands, & Random Thoughts‘ blog. For Felix, it’s all about people, brands, sports & politics. His motto is “fortune favors the bold!”
No related posts.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.






{ 6 trackbacks }
{ 72 comments… read them below or add one }
[New Post at The Human Race Horses] “Old Skool” Talent Acquisition: not your father’s social recruiting http://www.thehumanracehorses.com/2010/0…
Twitter: Alconcalcia
July 16, 2010 at 5:15 am
Good article Felix. I fail to be convinced by all the social media ‘gurus’ who pronounce social media the holy grail for recruiters. it’s not and never will be.
Case studies of success stories are few and far between and just like what happened to many job boards, Twitter, Facebook and Linkedin are being flooded with thousand upon thousand of poorly written recruiter ads, all thinking that if they throw enough bread on the social media water, sooner or later they will get a big bite.
Yes, Facebook has 500m users, yet for each job a recruiter posts, once you take into account location and relevant skills and experience, possibly 499,999,000 of those users are irrelevant, plus, will the people that ARE relevant even see or be interested in reading the ad? Just as customers don’t go into a chemists to buy a car, in my view, so people don’t go on Facebook to be recruited. It’s for inane chat with friends and family. That and its fair share of weirdos.
Its numbers are made up by an amalgamation of the very same people who are already used to using many other outlets for finding job. Outlets such as niche and generalist job boards, job alerts and the good old, very simple ‘job title and location’ Google search. As such, the recruitment consultancy world doesn’t need social media if all they are going to do is post jobs on there. Some employers may well benefit from it, I don’t deny that, but only in terms of using it to build awareness. Just blindly posting jobs will never work to any better degree than by using the means that have already existed for years.
In short, social recruiting, as it stands, is a bit of a fad, a novelty promoted by various ‘gurus’ and many conflicting yet self-serving surveys that as yet have no substance and cannot be backed up by cold hard facts, case studies and success stories. The jury is still very definitely out and will be for some time.
Twitter: FelixWetzel
July 19, 2010 at 6:52 am
Thanks for your comment. I completely agree with your view on Facebook, Alistair. A couple of years ago there was a rush to be the channel partner for portals of Freeserve and Yahoo – the love affair with Facebook is the same misunderstanding: the disconnect between reaching lots of people and the motivation and mindset of the people using it.
After all, it’s all about helping the indiviual to find a job so there whole life works better.
Twitter: stephenodonn
July 16, 2010 at 5:56 am
Fantastic piece Felix. This should be compulsory reading to many in this business.
As I’ve always said, recruitment boils down to just three ingredients; 1 candidate. 1 job and 1 employer. The rest is merely the means of getting there.
Tools used in attracting candidates, will always be measured in cost and time. Small and large employers will tackle things differently, and make use of the available tools differently, whether they engage directly themselves, or outsource the grunt work to recruitment agencies.
I wrote about Old Skool recruitment myself last week too. http://goo.gl/JKPp
Twitter: FelixWetzel
July 19, 2010 at 6:58 am
Hi Stephen, thanks for your comment and for sharing your article – which is worthwhile reading.
Every organization needs to choose the methods and tools that work best for them and have the best strategic and cultural fit. Additionally, it’s important that we always remember that everything we do has a direct impact on individuals and their entire life and that they might have a different motivations, mind sets and media usage to us.
[New Post at The Human Race Horses] "Old Skool" Talent Acquisition: not your father's social recruiting http://bit.ly/aTjFja
on HRH: “Old Skool” Talent Acquisition: not your father’s social recruiting http://goo.gl/fb/zwrow #overthere
Social Media is useless for talent acquisition – http://bit.ly/9cPdr4 – guest post for @MikeVanDervort The Human Race Horse blog
RT @FelixWetzel: Social Media is useless for talent acquisition – http://bit.ly/9cPdr4 – guest post for @MikeVanDervort The Human Race Horse blog
RT @FelixWetzel: Social Media is useless for talent acquisition – http://bit.ly/9cPdr4 – guest post for @MikeVanDervort #hr #shrm
Social Media is useless for talent acquisition http://lnkd.in/eYFAew
RT @MikeVanDervort Excellent guest article by @felixwetzel http://bit.ly/cMVUGu
Reassuring that someone (our Felix) actually "gets it" RT @MikeVanDervort “Old Skool” Talent Acquisition http://bit.ly/cMVUGu
RT @MikeVanDervort: Social Media is useless for talent acquisition http://lnkd.in/eYFAew
RT @SteveBoese RT @MikeVanDervort Social Media is useless for talent acquisition http://lnkd.in/eYFAew #talentmgmt
Is social media's biz value increasingly being de-valued w/posts like http://ht.ly/2clic more so than 6mos ago?
Social Media is useless for talent acquisition: http://bit.ly/czVkHz <–Social media = a cultural checking tool
RT @JobBoardDoctor: Social Media is useless for talent acquisition: http://bit.ly/czVkHz <–Social media = a cultural checking tool
RT @JobBoardDoctor: Social Media is useless for talent acquisition: http://bit.ly/czVkHz <–Social media = a cultural checking tool
Thanks for RT @Alconcalcia @stephenodonn @JobBoardDoctor @johncusworth @steevo SocMed useless for talent acquisition http://bit.ly/cMVUGu
For most companies social media will never play a big part in their quest to attract talent: http://bit.ly/bSwEj8
RT @MikeVanDervort “Old Skool” Talent Acquisition: not your father’s social recruiting http://bit.ly/cMVUGu from @FelixWetzel
RT @BillBoorman: RT @MikeVanDervort “Old Skool” Talent Acquisition: not your father’s social recruiting http://bit.ly/cMVUGu from @FelixWetzel
RT @BillBoorman: RT @MikeVanDervort “Old Skool” Talent Acquisition: not your father’s social recruiting http://bit.ly/cMVUGu from @Felix …
RT @BillBoorman: RT @MikeVanDervort “Old Skool” Talent Acquisition: not your father’s social recruiting http://bit.ly/cMVUGu from @Felix …
RT @MikeVanDervort: "Old Skool" Talent Acquisition: not your father's social recruiting http://bit.ly/bSwEj8
These are great cautions, but I do disagree with a couple of the comments, which may make social recruiting more valid.
1. I think social recruiting has got more to do with making other organisations into sexy brands (perhaps not for everyone, but for the people they’re interested in hiring) than it does with social media as a recruitment channel. If that’s all you’re thinking of it as, then I agree, it’s not going to get you very far. But the real benefit is attracting, not recruiting talent. It doesn’t matter what channel they come in from.
2. This is perhaps more of a response to Stephen than it is to Felix, but I also think it’s about more than just the individual. The power of social media is that it’s social. And if organisations are only using that power to get someone in through the door then it’s not using this to its full advantage. The opportunity is to create social bonds that continue into employment, and help to make a new joiner effective quickly and throughout their career. And the new joiner’s team as well. Of course, this can be done through any recruitment process, but social media makes it extremely easy. And this is the other thing that I think differentiates it from traditional recruiting.
Twitter: FelixWetzel
July 19, 2010 at 7:10 am
Thanks for your comment and the valuable points within, Jon.
I still think that for most organisations even the attracting via social media will be too time consuming. In my opinion, most organisations are better advised in building their brand performance – that will most likely lead to attracting talent in their chosen sector.
You are right social media is a really great tool to increase social bonds that continue into employment and as such social media is super charged word of mouth. However, social media is only one tool for internal communication, one that supports the bonds made in face to face interaction.
Twitter: loismelbourne
July 18, 2010 at 2:32 pm
I use my social media the same way I use any of my networks when it comes to recruiting. I let people know that I have positions open and hopefully they will know applicants that could be a good fit.
It has worked very well for us to locate people this way. It may be because my network includes software people, human resource people, succession planners, technical people and marketing people. They know others in their field…to it helps get the word out. This would be different then a recruiters network, I would think.
My volume level of about 5 positions a quarter is likely also a part of reason it works so well for us. But I do consider social media as tool in the tool box, not the only method for searching out good talent. Aquire has a really high number of referals from existing employees to find our future employees, so their staying in touch with their network is important.
Cheers,
Lois
Twitter: MikeVanDervort
July 18, 2010 at 8:32 pm
I used social media to recruit in small numbers going back to 2006. What you say makes perfect sense to me! Thanks for the comment.
Michael
Twitter: FelixWetzel
July 19, 2010 at 7:16 am
Michael, thanks for giving me the opportunity to share my views on your blog. It’s really appreciated.
Twitter: FelixWetzel
July 19, 2010 at 7:19 am
Thanks for the comment, Lois. Would you mind sharing some more information with us? I’d be especially interested in the following:
How does the referals from exsiting employees compare to social media?
Are the existing employees part of the social media network you use for recruitment?
Thanks
The Human Race Horses – “Old Skool” Talent Acquisition: not your father’s social recruiting http://bit.ly/a5L7Vc
“Old Skool” Talent Acquisition: not your father’s social recruiting « The Human Race Horses http://www.thehumanracehorses.com/?p=8883
Excellent insights, thanks a lot. I think the branding / Employer Branding factor is higher trough Social Media than the recruiting factor!
Twitter: FelixWetzel
July 19, 2010 at 5:21 pm
Thanks for your comment. Social Media certainly has a big impact on branding and can be used to influence the perception of a brand. Employer branding, for me, is a myth: Have a read of the following articles and I’d be really interested in your take on this topic:
http://felixwetzel.com/the-myth-of-employer-branding-156
http://hrringleader.com/2010/06/23/peopling-%E2%80%93-a-mash-up-of-hr-marketing/
Web 1:0 job boards – altogether now… “Social Media is useless for talent acquisition”http://bit.ly/cMVUGu
Twitter: dailycareertips
July 20, 2010 at 1:59 pm
Thanks Felix for your interesting take on this topic. I agree that Social Recruiting (SR) is not a good use of time from a posting perspective. But when did talent acquisition come to be only about posting and sourcing? If you’re recruiting for a high volume in a short period of time, maybe. But I see the value in engagement.
SR should be about reinforcing the brand and managing perceptions. Much of the success in social media on the consumer side (Comcast, Zappos, Best Buy) is focused more on relationship marketing than hard revenue generation.
If we see SR as the revenue generator for talent acquisition (i.e., sourcing) then we’re failing to learn from the successes our traditional marketing peers have had.
Social media is the intersection of a relationship with something to market and a medium to market it on. I think we should learn from our colleagues in classic marketing and emulate that it’s about marketing the experience, addressing our consumers (candidates, potential candidates and candidate influencers), and guiding them through the “purchase” or “purchase advisory process.”
Twitter: FelixWetzel
July 22, 2010 at 7:56 am
Susan, spot on. I completely agree: Social Media is a fantastic tool in the marketing tool box and for customers to engage with a brand and with the brand (and the people as they are the brand) at the core of it all. As are all the other engagement marketing channels.
The engagement with the brand will lead them to becoming potential employees and social media is a great tool to get a feel if they are on the same wavelength and have the same culture to move the company forwards.
However, for it to be successful, the candidate/consumer needs to be at the heart of an organisation.
I mentioned revenue as it is the way of measuring business that is understood by everybody and allows comparison to other methods. It also focuses on impact versus cost reduction.
It may not be working now, but it will surely work in 10 years, maybe less.
And that will happen because generation Y will be in their 30s or 40s and do you really think that they will still use cold calling and adds in the local paper?
When you used Facebook and Twitter since you were a teenager, that is “old school” for you. The rest is history.
Twitter: FelixWetzel
July 22, 2010 at 4:51 am
Thanks for the comment, Gabriel. I think all human beings, from whatever Generation will value human interaction more than anything else.
I have to agree with Susan comments here.
Felix what you say makes sense but only in the context of employers trying to make social media do what a job board already does.
However what social offers is something no job board has ever been able to do which is the ability build engagement with top level talent over a long period of time on a “weak tie” basis.
I’m working with a company at the moment that is reaching out to people it wants to hire in 18 months time by building it’s brand engagement with them via social tools. They are working with a very targeted and defined audience and this company is not a “big brand”. Before these social tools existed this kind of work could have only been done on a resource intensive one to one basis and would have been impossible to scale in the same way.
Job Boards have also never been able to drive referral recruitment and I believe that social will play a massive part in this area in the future. As more people become hyper connected, companies will benefit from the way social media platforms can be used to pass information about jobs on a peer to peer basis through the massive networks their employees have already built.
Twitter: FelixWetzel
July 22, 2010 at 8:04 am
Matt, thanks for your comment. I don’t doubt that social recruiting works for some companies, but it won’t yield enough benefit for the majority of companies.
Building engagement is nothing new – before social media it was done via message boards and via email or indeed via the phone. My main points are: Engagement is candidate focussed and human interaction is the strongest form of engagement.
Regarding referrals: On Jobsite.co.uk we have a service called “email a friend” – a candidate can send a job to a friend for consideration. In the first six months of this year nearly 300k of these peer to peer connections were made. These are significant numbers and without any prompting, without any time investment by any recruiter.
Additionally, many companies already use employee referral systems before social media was even invented. It was and will always be part of recruitment, social media just gives is another outlet and the ones I am aware of are putting the company or social media at the heart of it, instead of the indiviual.
Is social recruiting really useful? http://ow.ly/2e4ue
Is Social Recruiting Really Effective? #recruiting #career #HR #jobs http://bit.ly/bAGsNN
Is social recruiting really useful? http://ow.ly/2e6jO Can provide candidate, employer w/ valuable insights
“Old Skool” Talent Acquisition: not your father’s social recruiting " …social media doesn't work for Recruiting http://bit.ly/9nu0n5
“Old Skool” Talent Acquisition: not your father’s social recruiting " …social media doesn't work for Recruiting http://bit.ly/9nu0n5
Not yet, but it will, when gen Y will b in their 30s or 40s RT @JohnSumser:…social media doesn't work for #Recruiting http://bit.ly/9nu0n5
Interesting article about Social Media being useless for talent acquisition http://bit.ly/bAGsNN #recruiting
http://bit.ly/bAGsNN – Is social recruiting really useful? for those who have worked it out…. of course!
Have added some thoughts to @FelixWetzel 's recent post http://bit.ly/bAGsNN #socialrecruiting
#Social #Media is useless for #talent #acquisition – http://ht.ly/2eiCm
RT @MikeVanDervort “Old Skool” Talent Acquisition: not your father’s social recruiting http://bit.ly/cMVUGu
RT @alcartwright: RT @MikeVanDervort “Old Skool” Talent Acquisition: not your father’s social recruiting http://bit.ly/cMVUGu
Social Media is useless for talent acquisition http://bit.ly/bAGsNN
RT @alcartwright: RT @MikeVanDervort “Old Skool” Talent Acquisition: not your father’s social recruiting http://bit.ly/cMVUGu
Is social media useless for talent acquisition? (From the Human Race Horses blog) http://ow.ly/2e6F8 #hr
RT @MikeVanDervort “Old Skool” Talent Acquisition: not your father’s social recruiting http://bit.ly/cMVUGu -but then its the model you use!
RT @mattalder: Have added some thoughts to @FelixWetzel 's recent post http://bit.ly/bAGsNN #socialrecruiting <- here's my response