EFCA Light on the way?

by Michael VanDervort on June 10, 2010 · 7 comments

An example of a breaking news intro graphic
Image via Wikipedia

The new National Labor Relations Board is making the first big move in what is expected to be many changes to the long-standing rules and processes governing elections that determine union representation in the workplace.   My friend Phil Wilson from the Labor Relations Institute broke this information on his company website this morning.  I am reposting the article from LRI in its entirety because I want my readers to see it.   Phil is a labor relations genius, and you should add his blog to your reader and follow him if you practice HR!

Breaking: EFCA Light? NLRB Seeks Electronic Voting Information

As we’ve been reporting for months, if unions can’t get the Employee Free Choice Act through legislation, they will try to do it through administrative means. This evening the NLRB posted the following Request for Information (RFI-NLRB-01):

“The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is seeking industry solutions regarding the capacity, availability, methodology and interest of industry sources for procuring and implementing secure electronic voting services both for remote and on-site elections.” (emphasis ours)

The RFI continues:

“The NLRB’s requirements are for the acquisition of electronic voting services to support conducting secret-ballot elections to determine representation issues.  Specifically, the Agency requires a proven solution that supports mail, telephone, web-based and/or on-site electronic voting; that includes the necessary safeguards to ensure the accuracy, secrecy, observability, transparency, integrity, accountability, and auditability of Agency-conducted elections; and that has demonstrated experience in protecting similar type elections from both deliberate misconduct and simple error.  With respect to electronic voting capabilities, the Agency specifically requests information, to the extent available, relating to what safeguards, if any, could be implemented to ensure that votes cast remotely were free from distractions or other interferences, including undue intimidation or coercion.  The Agency also requests, to the extent available, information relating to experience regarding the level of participation achieved through remote electronic voting technology (vs. traditional on-site elections, whether manual or electronic).” (emphasis ours)

Make no mistake. If unions can’t get rid of the current election process through legislation, they will rely on the NLRB to do it for them.

Enhanced by Zemanta

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Michael VanDervort June 10, 2010 at 10:22 am

[New Post at The Human Race Horses] EFCA Light on th way? http://bit.ly/bvNjEP

Reply

2 Karla Porter
Twitter:
June 10, 2010 at 10:54 am

EFCA light – kinda sounds like the name for a new carbonated beverage… full of gas.

Reply

3 MikeVanDervort June 10, 2010 at 2:22 pm

[New Post at The Human Race Horses] EFCA Light on th way? http://www.thehumanracehorses.com/2010/0...

Reply

4 Michael VanDervort June 10, 2010 at 2:22 pm

[New Post at The Human Race Horses] EFCA Light on th way? http://bit.ly/bvNjEP

Reply

5 Michael VanDervort June 10, 2010 at 2:23 pm

on HRH: EFCA Light on th way? http://goo.gl/fb/kHexi #laborrelations #campaignsandelections #employeefreechoiceact

Reply

6 Michael VanDervort June 10, 2010 at 2:40 pm

RT @MikeVanDervort: EFCA Light on the way? http://bit.ly/coMnem

Reply

7 Michael VanDervort June 10, 2010 at 2:41 pm

EFCA Light on th way? http://bit.ly/coMnem #HR #SHRM #PRSCamp

Reply

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Previous post:

Next post: